Weighted Likelihood Ratio Scores for Evaluating Density Forecasts in Tails∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on likelihood ratios, for comparing density forecasts in the context of VaR modelling and expected loss estimation. Our approach is motivated by the observation that some existing weighted scoring rules tend to favour fat-tailed predictive densities over thin-tailed predictive densities. Rather than restricting the weight functions, we impose some restrictions on the score functions. Our benchmark case has fixed weights, equal to one in the left tail and zero elsewhere. Two different scoring rules based on partial likelihood are proposed for this zero-one case. After generalizing the new scoring rules to smooth weight functions, their properties are investigated numerically and illustrated by an empirical application.
منابع مشابه
Partial Likelihood-Based Scoring Rules for Evaluating Density Forecasts in Tails
We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the predictive accuracy of competing density forecasts over a specific region of interest, such as the left tail in financial risk management. These scoring rules are proper and can be interpreted in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence between weighted versions of the density forecast and the true density. Existing scoring ...
متن کاملComparing Density Forecasts Using Threshold and Quantile Weighted Scoring Rules
We propose a method for comparing density forecasts that is based on weighted versions of the continuous ranked probability score. The weighting emphasizes regions of interest, such as the tails or the center of a variable’s range, while retaining propriety, as opposed to a recently developed weighted likelihood ratio test, which can be hedged. Threshold and quantile based decompositions of the...
متن کاملLikelihood-based scoring rules for comparing density forecasts in tails
We propose new scoring rules based on conditional and censored likelihood for assessing the predictive accuracy of competing density forecasts over a specific region of interest, such as the left tail in financial riskmanagement. These scoring rules can be interpreted in terms of Kullback–Leibler divergence between weighted versions of the density forecast and the true density. Existing scoring...
متن کاملWeighted likelihood ratio scores for evaluating forecast densities in tails
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on likelihood ratios, for comparing forecast densities in the context of VaR modelling and expected loss estimation. Our approach is motivated by the observation that existing scoring rules tend to favour fat-tailed models when compared with thin-tailed models. Rather than restricting the weight functions, we impose some restrictions on th...
متن کاملEvaluating, comparing and combining density forecasts using the KLIC with an application to the Bank of England and NIESR “fan” charts of inflation∗
This paper proposes and analyses the Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion (KLIC) as a unified statistical tool to evaluate, compare and combine density forecasts. Use of the KLIC is particularly attractive, as well as operationally convenient, given its equivalence with the widely used Berkowitz Likelihood Ratio test for the evaluation of individual density forecasts that exploits the probabi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007